Our website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

BHP in talks to sell global oil, gas business to Australia’s Woodside

by maria
0 comment

By Sonali Paul

MELBOURNE (Reuters) – BHP Group Ltd is in talks to sell its petroleum business to Australia’s top independent gas producer Woodside Petroleum Ltd in exchange for shares, the companies confirmed on Monday.

The world’s biggest miner also said it had begun a strategic review of its oil and gas business — made up of assets in Australia, the Gulf of Mexico, Trinidad and Tobago, and Algeria – that analysts value at between $10 billion and $17 billion.

BHP has been facing calls to detail how and when it will exit fossil fuels. It has already sold some coal assets.

“While discussions between the parties are currently progressing, no agreement has been reached on any such transaction,” BHP said, adding that it was evaluating a number of options.

The confirmation came after numerous media reports about a possible deal ahead of BHP’s annual results on Tuesday and Woodside’s half-year results on Wednesday.

For Woodside, an acquisition of BHP’s oil and gas assets would roughly double its annual underlying earnings to around $8 billion. For BHP, a petroleum exit would strip out just 5% of underlying earnings.

“A Think Big Woodside, merged with BHP Petroleum, would present a globally significant LNG weighted company, with a diversity of low risk geographic exposure and growth options,” Credit Suisse analyst Saul Kavonic said in a note.

BHP’s assets would double Woodside’s annual output to 200 million barrels of oil equivalent. That would be nearly twice the combined volume produced by rivals Santos Ltd and Oil Search Ltd, which are set to merge.

A deal would also remove the main obstacle to Woodside’s biggest growth project, the $12 billion Scarborough/Pluto Train 2 development, which BHP has stalled amid protracted talks over a gas processing fee.

“Woodside is engaged in discussions with BHP regarding a potential merger involving BHP’s entire petroleum business through a distribution of Woodside shares to BHP shareholders,” Woodside said in a statement.

Woodside’s shares fell more than 4%, underperforming its closest rivals, on the prospect of a massive share issue by the A$20 billion ($15 billion) company. BHP’s shares slipped 0.2%.

Analysts said if BHP shareholders end up with Woodside shares some would look to sell them on concerns about holding a pure fossil fuel investment.

“They’re not all going to dump the stock, but there’s certainly an ESG overlay on top of it,” said James Hood, an analyst at Regal Funds Management, referring to environmental, social and governance issues. “That’s probably why the stock (Woodside) is weak today.”

BHP shareholders would own 53% of the combined group following a share issue, CLSA estimated.

CLSA analyst Daniel Butcher said BHP’s Gulf of Mexico assets would “open up entirely new growth avenues, relieving Woodside of its narrow focus on West Australia”, where it is totally dependent on the Scarborough/Pluto Train 2 project for growth.

“This would be genuinely transformational,” Butcher said in a note.

($1 = 1.3622 Australian dollars)

(Reporting by Sonali Paul; Additional reporting by Shashwat Awasthi in Bengaluru; editing by Uttaresh.V and Richard Pullin)