Our website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

Exclusive-G7 to discuss four versions of Russian diamond ban this week- sources

by Jessica Weisman-Pitts
0 comment

Exclusive-G7 to discuss four versions of Russian diamond ban this week- sources

By Julia Payne

BRUSSELS (Reuters) – G7 countries will this week discuss four plans to ban Russian diamonds from G7 markets from Jan. 1, from light-touch self-regulation to strict import measures, laying bare differences that explain why a ban has been so difficult to agree for more than a year, documents showed.

The four proposals were prepared by Belgium, India, a French jewellery industry group and the World Diamond Council and will be discussed at a technical meeting of G7 representatives on Thursday, officials close to the talks told Reuters.

A G7 ban would hit Russian diamond exports badly because G7 countries — United States, Canada, Japan, Germany, Britain, Italy and France — account for 70% of global diamond demand.

But it would also hit supply, because Russia is the world’s biggest producer of rough diamonds, accounting for 30% of them.

The main task of the meeting will be to agree in a legally sound way on a definition of traceability of diamonds, to be able to determine where the stones come from.

“Part of the reason we are stalled is that … it’s an indirect ban – it’s on Russian diamonds coming (into G7) from outside of Russia. It’s more complicated. There’s tension between keeping momentum with a political statement first or whether the technicals need to be decided in full first,” one of the sources familiar with discussions asking not be named said.

“In November we absolutely need to clear things up if we want to meet the Jan. 1 start,” the source said, adding that if a model is picked that requires government controls then it will take longer to push through legislation.

Agreement is tough because the details of a G7 ban could boost or deteriorate business conditions for some of the world’s major diamond centres in Belgium, India, or the United States and their share of the global $87 billion natural diamond jewellery business.

The main differences between the proposals include where the diamonds enter G7 markets, how they would be verified if they originate from Russia, and what the weight thresholds would be and consequences there would be for breaking the rules.

India and Belgium want the entry point to be their own diamond centres in Mumbai and the Antwerp respectively, France’s group wants multiple entry points to prevent bottlenecks and WDC wants a more self-regulating system. The weight threshold for the gems could be 1 carat or more for polished stones.

Belgium sees its reputation at stake and wants to make sure Russian gems do not circulate and fears getting stung by scandal later. It sees tracing and technology-based checks on rough diamonds as essential and best done at its Antwerp hub that already has robust requirements.

India fears putting to much of an onus on its small and medium-sized producers if a harsher model is adopted. India’s federal trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“There are intense G7 technical calls on the traceability mechanism taking place now. We hope there can be a public announcement soon,” a diplomatic source with knowledge of the matter said.

The EU and the G7 have been looking at a Russian diamond ban since 2022 as part of its sanctions on Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine.

The United States has already imposed sanctions on Russia’s state-owned diamond producer Alrosa, but without a global ban, it seems to be little affected – in the first half of this year it had revenue of $1.9 billion and dividends of $282 million.

After Moscow launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, major jewellers, such as American brand Tiffany’s, said they would no longer buy Russian diamonds.

But without the cooperation of India, where most of the world’s stones are cut, or without Belgium, whose city of Antwerp is the world’s biggest diamonds trading centre, it’s impossible to make sure that gems circulating between them and Dubai or Tel Aviv are not of Russian origin.

With all the global players involved, discussions have been slow even though diamonds, along with nuclear and liquefied natural gas, are among the few remaining significant revenue streams for Moscow that Western powers have not yet imposed full sanctions upon.


(Reporting by Julia Payne in Brussels; additional reporting by Polina Devitt in London, Mimosa Spencer in Paris, Rajendra Jadhav and Shivangi Acharya in New Delhi; editing by David Evans)