Our website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

EU moves to clarify ‘sustainable’ investments after fund downgrades

by Staff GBAF Publications Ltd
0 comment

EU moves to clarify ‘sustainable’ investments after fund downgrades

By Huw Jones

LONDON (Reuters) – The European Union’s executive body sought on Friday to clarify how investment products can be sold as “sustainable” to investors after asset managers downgraded many of their funds due to uncertainty over the rules.

Financial services commissioner Mairead McGuinness published amendments to the European Commission’s guidance on how to interpret the bloc’s sustainable finance disclosures regulation (SFDR), a core plank of EU efforts to reach a net zero economy.

“The application of the SFDR requirements represents a challenge to industry and regulators and these Q&As aim to offer guidance to facilitate the proper implementation of the rules,” McGuinness said in a statement.

“In parallel, we will continue our comprehensive assessment of the SFDR with a focus on ensuring legal certainty, increased usability and the mitigation of greenwashing. A public consultation is planned for the autumn.”

Asset managers have downgraded funds holding a total of 175 billion euros ($193 billion) of assets from the SFDR’s highest sustainability classification, known as Article 9, to the broader, less demanding Article 8 label, which requires sustainability to be only one of the factors informing investment decisions.

Many say there is no clear definition of what constitutes a sustainable investment. As recently as mid-January, some Article 9 funds had invested in assets such as thermal coal, which is a big climate change contributor.

The downgrades come at a time when regulators are becoming more vocal in their fight against so-called greenwashing or inflated environmentally-friendly claims.

The amendments on Friday reiterate that Article 9 funds must have sustainable investment as their objective, but then add that SFDR “does not prescribe a single methodology to account for sustainable investments”.

Asset managers can include investments for certain specific purposes, such as hedging or liquidity, in an Article 9 fund, but only if they are in line with the sustainable investment objective, the amendments say.

And any given mix of assets in an Article 9 fund – which are often sold at a premium – must also be in line with the sustainable investment objective to comply with the overall aim of the rules to do no significant harm to the environment.

($1 = 0.9048 euros)


(Reporting by Huw Jones; Editing by Alexander Smith)